Coordinate systems serve as a fundamental framework for defining geometry, meshing, boundary conditions, element and material orientation, and results in FEA. They provide a structured way to describe positions, orientations, and transformations within a model, ensuring accuracy in simulations. Without a well-defined coordinate system, interpreting results and applying boundary conditions would become impossible. In this article, we’ll explore the different types of coordinate systems in FEA, their roles, and best practices for effective use.
Coordinate Systems in FEA Definition
Coordinate systems in FEA serve as a framework for pinpointing the location of a point in space. To establish a coordinate system, you need to specify an origin point and determine the directions of the axes. In engineering simulations, different coordinate systems are used to simplify calculations and align with real-world conditions.
Modern structural analysis software, such as SDC Verifier, allows engineers to create coordinate systems easily. In SDC Verifier, you can create and modify coordinate systems to define geometry, mesh, FEM loads, results, and constraints. The software provides multiple methods for generating coordinate systems:
Angles Method
Workplane Method
Coordinates Method (XY locate, YZ locate, ZX locate) Axis Method (XY Axes, YZ Axes, ZX Axes)
Types of Coordinate Systems in FEA
FEA software typically supports multiple types of coordinate systems, each serving specific purposes in FEA and geometry creation. The most used coordinate systems in FEA include:
1. Global Coordinate System (GCS)
The global coordinate system defines the position and translation of an entire FEA model. While it is most defined as a global Cartesian (rectangular) system (X, Y, Z), some FEA solvers also support global cylindrical or spherical coordinate systems, depending on the analysis needs.
Although the final assembly of matrix calculations (like stiffness, mass, and damping) is performed in the global system, local coordinate transformations are often applied at the element level before integration into the global matrices.
Role in FEA:
Establishes a universal reference for all model components.
Used for defining overall geometry and boundary conditions (constraints and loads).
Helps in post-processing results in a consistent manner.
2. Local Coordinate System (LCS)
A local coordinate system is a custom reference frame assigned to a specific part or element of a model. A local coordinate system in FEA can be Cartesian, cylindrical, or spherical, depending on the application.
Role in FEA:
Used for defining symmetry boundary conditions, etc.
Helps apply loads and constraints more naturally, such as defining a pipe clamp’s radial constraint using a cylindrical coordinate system.
Allows results to be displayed in a more intuitive manner, e.g., deformation of a column vessel shown in radial, axial, and circumferential directions.
Each finite element in an FEA model has its own element coordinate system, which is automatically generated by the FEA solver. While Cartesian systems are common, some elements — such as beams, shells, and composite materials — may use cylindrical or material-aligned coordinate systems to better reflect their geometry or directional behavior.
Although FEA solvers can automatically assign an ECS, in many cases — especially with anisotropic or composite materials — the user must manually define the correct orientation to ensure accurate results.
Role in FEA:
Determines element-specific stiffness matrices and stress transformations.
The orientation of a local (element) coordinate system varies by element type. For example:
Beam elements have a primary axis (X) aligned along the element length. The Y-axis is typically defined by the user to orient the cross-section in space. The third axis (Z) is not explicitly defined but is mathematically derived as perpendicular to the plane formed by X and Y.
Shell or surface elements lie in the X-Y plane, with the third (imaginary) axis defined perpendicular to the element’s surface — useful for interpreting out-of-plane results like bending or normal stresses.
Coordinate systems assist in defining model geometry and generating an efficient mesh:
Structured meshing techniques, such as hexahedral meshing, benefit from coordinate-aligned grids.
For anisotropic materials, correct alignment with material properties ensures accurate stress predictions.
2. Applying Loads and Boundary Conditions
In FEA, loads and constraints must be applied in appropriate coordinate systems to ensure realistic simulations:
Global Loads: These are defined relative to the global coordinate system, which serves as a fixed reference for the entire model. While not necessarily applied uniformly, they are interpreted consistently across the structure.
For example, gravity loads are commonly applied in the global system, though some solvers also support defining them in a local coordinate system when needed.
Local Loads: These are applied in a local coordinate system to target specific areas. For example, a radial load on a pipe can be applied using a cylindrical coordinate system.
Element Loads: Loads specific to elements, such as pressure on a surface element or axial force on a beam element, are defined in the elements or global coordinate system.
Importance
Accuracy: Using the appropriate coordinate system ensures that loads and constraints are applied accurately, reflecting the real-world scenario.
Simplification: Local and element coordinate systems can simplify the application of complex loads and boundary conditions, making the model easier to manage and interpret.
Result Interpretation: Results can be transformed and viewed in different coordinate systems, aiding in better understanding and analysis of the model’s behavior.
3. Post-Processing and Result Interpretation
After solving an FEA model, result visualization and interpretation rely on coordinate systems:
Stress tensors and displacement vectors are typically available in both global and local coordinate systems.
Transformations between coordinate systems help engineers analyze structural behavior more effectively.
Custom coordinate systems facilitate easier interpretation of results in complex assemblies.
Transformations Between Coordinate Systems
In many cases, FEA requires transformations between different coordinate systems to ensure consistency and accuracy. These transformations involve:
Rotation matrices: Used to convert vectors from one coordinate system to another.
Translation operations: Applied when shifting reference points.
Strain and stress transformations: Necessary for understanding directional stress responses in materials.
FEA software automates these transformations, but engineers must verify that coordinate definitions align with the intended physical behavior. A small misalignment in transformation matrices can result in significant errors in stress and strain outputs, impacting the overall reliability of the simulation.
Conclusion
Coordinate systems in FEA are fundamental to defining geometry, meshing, applying loads, and interpreting results. Proper usage of global, local, and element coordinate systems enhances simulation accuracy and ensures reliable structural analysis. Engineers must understand coordinate transformations and best practices to avoid errors and improve the quality of FEA simulations.
By mastering coordinate systems in FEA, engineers can optimize their models, improve computational efficiency, and generate more accurate engineering insights.
