
In most FEA workflows, the moment you open a stress contour plot is also the moment you realize how little clarity it provides. Yes, you can immediately see that some regions exceed your selected threshold. But identifying exactly which elements are critical and why quickly becomes a manual, time-consuming task.
This issue becomes even less reliable in mixed beam and shell models, where peak areas can appear fragmented or partially hidden. What looks like one hotspot may be several separate zones. In a full-field view, critical regions can also be overlooked entirely.
SDC Verifier’s Peak Finder tool solves this by reducing the model to only what matters. Instead of scanning the entire contour, you define a criterion and isolate just the zones that meet it, turning a dense stress plot into a clear set of actionable results. In this article, you will learn a practical workflow to identify overstressed zones, visualize them clearly, and understand which loads are driving them using the Peak Finder tool. This workflow starts after stress results already exist, and a contour plot has already been created.
The Peak Finder tool acts as a rule-based filter applied directly to your existing results. Instead of manually inspecting the contour plot, you define a condition and let the tool extract only the regions that match it.
Here, the rule is simple and practical:
Here, the threshold is simply the filter condition used to isolate relevant zones; it is not a built-in pass/fail limit.
Image: Model with highlighted stress zones
Once applied, Peak Finder scans the results and identifies all areas that meet this criterion. The output is not just a visual highlight; it is a structured set of peak zones that can be further analyzed.
Each detected zone can be displayed with labels, element IDs, or stress values, depending on how you configure the output. These zones can also be organized into tables, making it easy to review and compare them.
Beyond identification, Peak Finder enables deeper analysis by linking each zone to the loads that influence it. This allows you to generate tables and graphs showing load contribution, so you can clearly see which load cases are driving the peak results in each zone.
If you need background on peak stress, singularities, and stress concentrations, see our earlier Peak Finder article.
The workflow begins with a standard stress contour plot based on your analysis results. In the demonstrated setup, the model includes a combination of beam and shell elements, which reflects a typical structural FEA scenario.
The job itself contains multiple loading definitions, including:
To review the results, you start by right-clicking the envelope load sets group and creating a contour plot. After selecting the appropriate result category and load group, the stress distribution is displayed.
Image: The contour plot in SDC Verifier software
At this stage, it is already clear that some stress values exceed 200 MPa. However, the contour plot alone does not provide enough clarity. The overstressed regions are visible, but they are embedded within the full model, making it difficult to isolate exactly which elements are responsible.
This limitation is what drives the need for Peak Finder: transforming a general stress visualization into a focused view of only the critical zones.
Once you’ve identified that the contour plot alone is not enough, the next step is to add a Peak Finder tool that isolates only the relevant results. This is where the workflow becomes structured and repeatable.
Start by opening the Postprocessing section in the model tree. Then right-click on Peak Finder and select Add. This opens the Peak Finder configuration window, where you define the criteria for detecting peak zones.
Image: Peak Finder tool
In this example, the setup is based directly on stress results:
Next, define the result range. This is the key parameter that controls which elements will be included. Here, the goal is to capture all potentially critical areas, so the threshold is set to:
With this condition, Peak Finder will scan the model and identify every region that meets or exceeds this stress level.
After completing the setup, click OK. The Peak Finder rule will appear in the model tree, ready to be used for generating tables, visualizations, and further analysis of the detected peak zones.
After defining the Peak Finder rule, the next step is to turn the filtered results into a structured list of peak zones. This allows you to move from a visual interpretation to a clear, reviewable dataset.
To do this, right-click the Peak Finder rule in the model tree and create a table. In the table settings, you can control how the results are presented and what data is included.
Image: Peak Zone Table window
You can select:
Once all parameters are defined, click Fill to generate the table.
In this example, the rule is set at ≥ 200 MPa, and the resulting detected zones all happen to be above 220 MPa.
Image: Four peak zones in the Peak Zone Table
Instead of scanning the entire contour plot, you now have a clearly defined set of critical regions that can be directly analyzed and compared.
Once the peak zones are identified in the table, you can switch back to the graphical view and focus only on those critical areas. This step connects the structured data with a clear visual representation.
Select the zones directly from the table and preview them on the plot. The visualization updates immediately: only the selected peak zones remain visible, while the rest of the model becomes transparent.
Image: 4 peak zones in the model, visualization
Each zone is displayed with its corresponding stress value, making it easy to interpret the severity of each region. Instead of a full contour with overlapping gradients, you now see a clean and focused view of only the elements that meet your defined criteria.
After isolating the peak zones, the next step is to understand what is causing them. Peak Finder allows you to move beyond identification and analyze how different loads contribute to each critical region.
To do this, create a table with load set content and factors from the Peak Finder window.
Image: Table with identified loads for peak zones
This table provides a breakdown for each detected zone, showing:
This makes it immediately clear which load has the dominant effect and whether the peak is driven by a single load case or a combination of several.
For a more visual interpretation, you can also generate a graph. The graph displays the influence of each individual load, allowing you to quickly compare their contributions across zones.
Image: Graph with the loads on peak zones
Together, the table and graph give you a complete picture of not just where the peaks occur, but which loads are responsible for them — turning raw results into a clear explanation of which loads drive each peak zone.
This workflow is most useful when standard contour plots stop being informative and start becoming overwhelming. Instead of manually interpreting dense result fields, you can apply a clear criterion and immediately focus on what matters.
Use this approach when:
In these situations, Peak Finder helps convert a visual problem into a clear post-processing workflow.
A contour plot shows that a problem exists, but it does not clearly show which elements govern. Peak Finder solves that by isolating the exact peak zones that meet your criteria. The table shows where those zones are, and the load influence table reveals which loads are driving them.
Stay updated with the latest in structural verification, engineering insights, and SDC Verifier updates.